This bill modifies requirements related to development agreements.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Development agreements — contracts between a property owner and a city or county spelling out what can be built on a piece of land and how — would take priority over conflicting local land use rules under this bill, for agreements entered into by either a municipality or a county. The bill would also protect property owners who had a development agreement approved by a county before their land became part of a city, either through incorporation or annexation: the new city could not adopt temporary land use rules that limit or impair the rights spelled out in that agreement, could not otherwise restrict the development or use of the property as specified in the agreement, and could not refuse to provide the property the same municipal services it provides to other properties in the city, or any services the agreement specifies a county or municipality will provide. The bill also clarifies that a later incorporation or annexation does not affect a development agreement or land use application a county already approved.
Introduction
Mar 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Governor
IntroductionMar 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Governor
This bill modifies requirements related to development agreements.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Development agreements — contracts between a property owner and a city or county spelling out what can be built on a piece of land and how — would take priority over conflicting local land use rules under this bill, for agreements entered into by either a municipality or a county. The bill would also protect property owners who had a development agreement approved by a county before their land became part of a city, either through incorporation or annexation: the new city could not adopt temporary land use rules that limit or impair the rights spelled out in that agreement, could not otherwise restrict the development or use of the property as specified in the agreement, and could not refuse to provide the property the same municipal services it provides to other properties in the city, or any services the agreement specifies a county or municipality will provide. The bill also clarifies that a later incorporation or annexation does not affect a development agreement or land use application a county already approved.
Senate/ filed
Senate file for bills not passed
Senate/ strike enacting clause
Senate Secretary
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
Senate Rules Committee
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0330
Released
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0330
Version Sponsor
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM