This bill prohibits certain non-disclosure agreements between prospective data centers and state and local governments.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Large data centers—facilities using 20 megawatts of electricity or more—are sometimes able to negotiate confidentiality terms with government bodies while their projects are still under review. This bill would bar state agencies, cities, towns, and counties from entering into non-disclosure agreements with such "prospective" data centers (those still seeking permits or approvals) going forward, making any such secrecy agreement automatically void and unenforceable while leaving the rest of the contract in force. If a government body enters into a prohibited agreement anyway, it would be required to post the agreement publicly on its website within 30 days and keep it posted for at least five years, and residents would be able to sue in district court to have the agreement declared void or to force compliance with the disclosure requirement.
Introduction
Feb 23
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Governor
IntroductionFeb 23
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Governor
This bill prohibits certain non-disclosure agreements between prospective data centers and state and local governments.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Large data centers—facilities using 20 megawatts of electricity or more—are sometimes able to negotiate confidentiality terms with government bodies while their projects are still under review. This bill would bar state agencies, cities, towns, and counties from entering into non-disclosure agreements with such "prospective" data centers (those still seeking permits or approvals) going forward, making any such secrecy agreement automatically void and unenforceable while leaving the rest of the contract in force. If a government body enters into a prohibited agreement anyway, it would be required to post the agreement publicly on its website within 30 days and keep it posted for at least five years, and residents would be able to sue in district court to have the agreement declared void or to force compliance with the disclosure requirement.
Senate/ filed
Senate file for bills not passed
Senate/ strike enacting clause
Senate Secretary
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
Senate Rules Committee
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0318
Released
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0318
Version Sponsor
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM