SB0233S01 (Substitute)
Judicial Performance Evaluation Amendments
Introduction
Feb 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Feb 9
Senate 2nd Reading
Feb 23
Senate 3rd Reading
Feb 24
House Rules
Feb 26
House Committee
Feb 26
House Floor Vote
Mar 4
Governor Signed
Mar 23
This bill makes changes related to the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
This bill updates the laws governing how Utah's Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission — the independent body that assesses whether judges are performing well enough to appear on retention election ballots — conducts its evaluations and surveys. It reorganizes and restructures the relevant statutes, clarifies meeting and voting requirements, expands the judicial performance survey to include parties who appeared in a case (not just attorneys, jurors, and court staff), and revamps the survey categories to separately assess judges on legal competence, impartiality, communication, temperament, and administrative capacity. It also adds new, specific deadlines for Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges to issue written opinions — for example, Supreme Court justices must distribute all opinions within one year of submission — and requires the commission to study whether how often a judge is reversed on appeal should factor into evaluations, reporting findings to the Legislature by November 2026.
Current version: SB0233S01 (Substitute)
Introduction
Feb 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Feb 9
Senate 2nd Reading
Feb 23
Senate 3rd Reading
Feb 24
House Rules
Feb 26
House Committee
Feb 26
House Floor Vote
Mar 4
Governor Signed
Mar 23
IntroductionFeb 3
Senate Rules
Senate CommitteeFeb 9
Senate 2nd ReadingFeb 23
Senate 3rd ReadingFeb 24
House RulesFeb 26
House CommitteeFeb 26
House Floor VoteMar 4
Governor SignedMar 23
This bill makes changes related to the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
This bill updates the laws governing how Utah's Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission — the independent body that assesses whether judges are performing well enough to appear on retention election ballots — conducts its evaluations and surveys. It reorganizes and restructures the relevant statutes, clarifies meeting and voting requirements, expands the judicial performance survey to include parties who appeared in a case (not just attorneys, jurors, and court staff), and revamps the survey categories to separately assess judges on legal competence, impartiality, communication, temperament, and administrative capacity. It also adds new, specific deadlines for Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges to issue written opinions — for example, Supreme Court justices must distribute all opinions within one year of submission — and requires the commission to study whether how often a judge is reversed on appeal should factor into evaluations, reporting findings to the Legislature by November 2026.
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Governor Signed
Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
Senate/ to Governor
Executive Branch - Governor
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
Senate Secretary
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
Senate Secretary
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
Senate Secretary
Last updated Mar 26, 2026, 9:45 PM