S.B. 233
Signed into LawJudicial Performance Evaluation Amendments
SB0233S01 (Substitute)
Judicial Performance Evaluation Amendments
Introduction
Feb 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Feb 9
Senate 2nd Reading
Feb 23
Senate 3rd Reading
Feb 24
House Rules
Feb 26
House Committee
Feb 26
House Floor Vote
Mar 4
Governor Signed
Mar 23
What This Bill Does
This bill makes changes related to the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.
Key Provisions
This bill:
- amends definitions;
- renumbers and reorganizes statutory provisions in Title 78A, Chapter 12, Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission;
- addresses the requirements for a meeting of the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (Commission);
- requires the Commission to perform a study regarding reversal on appeal and provide a report to the Judiciary Interim Committee on the study;
- requires the Commission to allow a judge to appear and speak at a commission meeting in certain circumstances;
- modifies the requirements for the judicial performance survey, including the contents of the survey;
- modifies the certification standards for judicial performance, including the certification standards for a justice of the Utah Supreme Court and a judge of the Utah Court of Appeals; and
- makes technical and conforming changes.
Plain-Language Summary
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
This bill updates the laws governing how Utah's Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission — the independent body that assesses whether judges are performing well enough to appear on retention election ballots — conducts its evaluations and surveys. It reorganizes and restructures the relevant statutes, clarifies meeting and voting requirements, expands the judicial performance survey to include parties who appeared in a case (not just attorneys, jurors, and court staff), and revamps the survey categories to separately assess judges on legal competence, impartiality, communication, temperament, and administrative capacity. It also adds new, specific deadlines for Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges to issue written opinions — for example, Supreme Court justices must distribute all opinions within one year of submission — and requires the commission to study whether how often a judge is reversed on appeal should factor into evaluations, reporting findings to the Legislature by November 2026.
S.B. 233
Signed into LawJudicial Performance Evaluation Amendments
Current version: SB0233S01 (Substitute)
Introduction
Feb 3
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Feb 9
Senate 2nd Reading
Feb 23
Senate 3rd Reading
Feb 24
House Rules
Feb 26
House Committee
Feb 26
House Floor Vote
Mar 4
Governor Signed
Mar 23
IntroductionFeb 3
Senate Rules
Senate CommitteeFeb 9
Senate 2nd ReadingFeb 23
Senate 3rd ReadingFeb 24
House RulesFeb 26
House CommitteeFeb 26
House Floor VoteMar 4
Governor SignedMar 23
What This Bill Does
This bill makes changes related to the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.
Key Provisions
This bill:
- amends definitions;
- renumbers and reorganizes statutory provisions in Title 78A, Chapter 12, Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission;
- addresses the requirements for a meeting of the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (Commission);
- requires the Commission to perform a study regarding reversal on appeal and provide a report to the Judiciary Interim Committee on the study;
- requires the Commission to allow a judge to appear and speak at a commission meeting in certain circumstances;
- modifies the requirements for the judicial performance survey, including the contents of the survey;
- modifies the certification standards for judicial performance, including the certification standards for a justice of the Utah Supreme Court and a judge of the Utah Court of Appeals; and
- makes technical and conforming changes.
Plain-Language Summary
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
This bill updates the laws governing how Utah's Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission — the independent body that assesses whether judges are performing well enough to appear on retention election ballots — conducts its evaluations and surveys. It reorganizes and restructures the relevant statutes, clarifies meeting and voting requirements, expands the judicial performance survey to include parties who appeared in a case (not just attorneys, jurors, and court staff), and revamps the survey categories to separately assess judges on legal competence, impartiality, communication, temperament, and administrative capacity. It also adds new, specific deadlines for Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges to issue written opinions — for example, Supreme Court justices must distribute all opinions within one year of submission — and requires the commission to study whether how often a judge is reversed on appeal should factor into evaluations, reporting findings to the Legislature by November 2026.
Votes
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Documents
Floor Debates
Committee Hearings
Other Versions
Subjects
Action History46
Governor Signed
Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
Senate/ to Governor
Executive Branch - Governor
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
Senate Secretary
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
Senate Secretary
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
Senate Secretary
Last updated Mar 26, 2026, 9:45 PM
