This bill addresses requirements for a chemical test of an individual involved in a motor vehicle accident.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Utah's implied consent law holds that drivers automatically agree to chemical testing for alcohol or drugs when operating a vehicle. This bill would change the standard for when a peace officer must order such a test from having "grounds to believe" a violation occurred to the somewhat lower bar of "reasonable suspicion" that a driver was operating a vehicle while impaired or in violation of related alcohol or drug laws. It would also require that when an officer investigating a fatal crash believes there isn't enough evidence to seek a warrant for a chemical test, that officer must first review the facts of the case with a senior officer to confirm no impairment is suspected before deciding not to pursue a warrant. The bill also makes several technical wording changes throughout the law, including updating the maximum ignition interlock device requirement period for test refusal from three years to two years.
Current version: SB0226S02 (Substitute)
Introduction
Feb 2
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Feb 4
Senate 2nd Reading
Feb 23
Senate 3rd Reading
Feb 25
House Rules
Mar 3
House Committee
Mar 2
House Floor Vote
Mar 6
Senate Concurrence
Mar 6
Governor Signed
Mar 23
IntroductionFeb 2
Senate Rules
Senate CommitteeFeb 4
Senate 2nd ReadingFeb 23
Senate 3rd ReadingFeb 25
House RulesMar 3
House CommitteeMar 2
House Floor VoteMar 6
Senate ConcurrenceMar 6
Governor SignedMar 23
This bill addresses requirements for a chemical test of an individual involved in a motor vehicle accident.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Utah's implied consent law holds that drivers automatically agree to chemical testing for alcohol or drugs when operating a vehicle. This bill would change the standard for when a peace officer must order such a test from having "grounds to believe" a violation occurred to the somewhat lower bar of "reasonable suspicion" that a driver was operating a vehicle while impaired or in violation of related alcohol or drug laws. It would also require that when an officer investigating a fatal crash believes there isn't enough evidence to seek a warrant for a chemical test, that officer must first review the facts of the case with a senior officer to confirm no impairment is suspected before deciding not to pursue a warrant. The bill also makes several technical wording changes throughout the law, including updating the maximum ignition interlock device requirement period for test refusal from three years to two years.
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Governor Signed
Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
Governor Signed
Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
Senate/ to Governor
Executive Branch - Governor
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
Senate Secretary
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
Senate Secretary
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM