This rules resolution modifies House Rules.
This resolution:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Several changes to how the Utah House of Representatives conducts its internal business would take effect under this resolution. It would create a formal process allowing bill sponsors to submit up to two pages of supporting information — such as their policy goals or anticipated impacts — to the House clerk for public posting on the sponsor's webpage, with a required disclaimer that the document has not been verified for accuracy and cannot be used as evidence of legislative intent. It would also require bill sponsors to sit at the presenter's table during committee hearings on their legislation (with some exceptions), give sponsors a chance to respond to committee motions and debate (though a chair could waive this for motions recommending favorable passage), and allow the full House to move legislation off the consent calendar — a streamlined voting track with no debate — onto the regular third-reading calendar by majority vote. Additionally, the bill would clarify that reinstating a previously deleted word in a verbal committee or floor amendment does not count toward the 15-word limit for such amendments, would let representatives read from prepared remarks during floor debate or when raising a personal privilege matter if the presiding officer grants permission, and would update the definition of "nonbinding resolution" to match the definition already used elsewhere in legislative rules.
Current version: HR0007S03 (Substitute)
Introduction
Feb 23
House Rules
House Committee
Feb 25
House Floor Vote
Mar 2
IntroductionFeb 23
House Rules
House CommitteeFeb 25
House Floor VoteMar 2
This rules resolution modifies House Rules.
This resolution:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Several changes to how the Utah House of Representatives conducts its internal business would take effect under this resolution. It would create a formal process allowing bill sponsors to submit up to two pages of supporting information — such as their policy goals or anticipated impacts — to the House clerk for public posting on the sponsor's webpage, with a required disclaimer that the document has not been verified for accuracy and cannot be used as evidence of legislative intent. It would also require bill sponsors to sit at the presenter's table during committee hearings on their legislation (with some exceptions), give sponsors a chance to respond to committee motions and debate (though a chair could waive this for motions recommending favorable passage), and allow the full House to move legislation off the consent calendar — a streamlined voting track with no debate — onto the regular third-reading calendar by majority vote. Additionally, the bill would clarify that reinstating a previously deleted word in a verbal committee or floor amendment does not count toward the 15-word limit for such amendments, would let representatives read from prepared remarks during floor debate or when raising a personal privilege matter if the presiding officer grants permission, and would update the definition of "nonbinding resolution" to match the definition already used elsewhere in legislative rules.
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
House/ to Lieutenant Governor
Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
Clerk of the House
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
Clerk of the House
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
Clerk of the House
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM