Proposal to Amend Utah Constitution - Judicial Retention
Introduction
Jan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
This joint resolution of the Utah Legislature proposes to amend the Utah Constitution to modify provisions related to retention of judges.
This resolution:
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
A proposed amendment to the Utah Constitution, this resolution would give the Legislature the power to trigger a special "retention election" — an up-or-down public vote — on any judge the Legislature determines is unfit, incompetent, persistently slow in deciding cases, or has acted improperly or in violation of their oath of office. Under current law, judges face routine retention elections on a set schedule (every 10 years for Supreme Court justices, every 6 years for other judges), but this amendment would allow the Legislature to put a judge before voters sooner, outside that normal cycle. The Legislature would also write the specific rules for how the process works in statute, and if a special election falls in the same year as a regular one, the special election can substitute for it. Utah voters would first decide whether to add this process to the state constitution, and if approved, it takes effect January 1, 2027.
Introduction
Jan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
IntroductionJan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
This joint resolution of the Utah Legislature proposes to amend the Utah Constitution to modify provisions related to retention of judges.
This resolution:
AI-generated summary, reviewed by Better Utah staff.
A proposed amendment to the Utah Constitution, this resolution would give the Legislature the power to trigger a special "retention election" — an up-or-down public vote — on any judge the Legislature determines is unfit, incompetent, persistently slow in deciding cases, or has acted improperly or in violation of their oath of office. Under current law, judges face routine retention elections on a set schedule (every 10 years for Supreme Court justices, every 6 years for other judges), but this amendment would allow the Legislature to put a judge before voters sooner, outside that normal cycle. The Legislature would also write the specific rules for how the process works in statute, and if a special election falls in the same year as a regular one, the special election can substitute for it. Utah voters would first decide whether to add this process to the state constitution, and if approved, it takes effect January 1, 2027.
House/ filed
House file for bills not passed
House/ strike enacting clause
Clerk of the House
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
House Rules Committee
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR013
Released
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
House Rules Committee
Last updated Mar 26, 2026, 9:43 PM