This bill addresses immunity for certain firearm discharges.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Firearm liability protections in Utah would expand under this bill in two ways. First, government entities, officers, and employees would be shielded from lawsuits over injuries or damage caused when someone lawfully discharges a firearm on government-owned, leased, or controlled property, as long as the government simply allowed firearm possession under existing law, policy, or practice; this immunity would not apply if government officials actively encouraged or helped someone discharge a firearm for an unlawful purpose. Second, current law already protects property occupants — such as landlords or tenants — from liability when someone they've allowed onto their property lawfully discharges a firearm there; this bill would broaden that protection by removing the requirement that the property be privately owned and by extending it to businesses and other legal entities, not just individuals, who occupy property under an agreement. In both cases, people injured by a firearm discharge on covered property would face greater legal barriers to seeking compensation, unless the government or property occupant intentionally encouraged the unlawful use of the firearm.
Current version: HB0534S01 (Substitute)
Introduction
Feb 10
House Rules
House Committee
Feb 18
House Floor Vote
Feb 24
Senate Rules
Mar 4
Senate Committee
Feb 27
Senate 2nd Reading
Mar 2
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
IntroductionFeb 10
House Rules
House CommitteeFeb 18
House Floor VoteFeb 24
Senate RulesMar 4
Senate CommitteeFeb 27
Senate 2nd ReadingMar 2
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
This bill addresses immunity for certain firearm discharges.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
Firearm liability protections in Utah would expand under this bill in two ways. First, government entities, officers, and employees would be shielded from lawsuits over injuries or damage caused when someone lawfully discharges a firearm on government-owned, leased, or controlled property, as long as the government simply allowed firearm possession under existing law, policy, or practice; this immunity would not apply if government officials actively encouraged or helped someone discharge a firearm for an unlawful purpose. Second, current law already protects property occupants — such as landlords or tenants — from liability when someone they've allowed onto their property lawfully discharges a firearm there; this bill would broaden that protection by removing the requirement that the property be privately owned and by extending it to businesses and other legal entities, not just individuals, who occupy property under an agreement. In both cases, people injured by a firearm discharge on covered property would face greater legal barriers to seeking compensation, unless the government or property occupant intentionally encouraged the unlawful use of the firearm.
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
House/ filed
House file for bills not passed
House/ received from Senate
Clerk of the House
Senate/ to House
Clerk of the House
Senate/ strike enacting clause
Senate Secretary
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules
Senate Rules Committee
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM