You're previewing an early version of the Bill Tracker. We're still ironing out some bugs — thanks for your patience as we build this out.

H.B. 477

Failed

Land Use Regulation Revisions

View on le.utah.gov
H.B. 477Failed

Land Use Regulation Revisions

House
Senate
Governor

What This Bill Does

This bill modifies provisions related to land use.

Key Provisions

This bill:

  • amends requirements for a modified feasibility request related to a proposed municipal incorporation;
  • modifies requirements for an ordinance establishing a planning commission;
  • modifies planning commission powers and duties;
  • modifies the requirement to place certain infrastructure completion assurances in an interest-bearing account;
  • requires a specified municipality to allow a detached accessory dwelling unit as a permitted use in certain zones;
  • clarifies notice requirements for a proposed county land use ordinance that is ministerial in nature;
  • modifies a county's authority to deny an applicant a building permit or certificate of occupancy if the applicant has not completed an infrastructure improvement; and
  • makes technical and conforming changes.

Plain-Language Summary

AI-generated summary. We recommend consulting the bill text for important decisions.

Covering a wide range of land use procedures, this bill makes several changes to how Utah cities and counties manage planning commissions, development approvals, and housing options. It requires larger cities — called "specified municipalities" — to allow detached accessory dwelling units (small, separate homes on the same lot as a single-family house) as a permitted use by right in residential zones, meaning cities cannot require a special permit just to build one, though they may still set reasonable size, parking, and design standards. The bill also updates the rules for planning commission ordinances, adding specific grounds for removing a commission member — such as ethics violations or intentional bias in land use decisions — while clarifying that normal deliberation with staff or applicants is not grounds for removal. Additionally, it limits when counties can deny building permits or certificates of occupancy due to incomplete infrastructure, and clarifies that routine or clerical county land use ordinance changes require less formal public notice.