This bill modifies the oversight of the Office of Professional Licensure Review.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
The Office of Professional Licensure Review, the state body that examines whether occupational licensing rules are necessary and appropriate, would see updates to how it conducts and documents its work under this bill. It would formally define "harm" as a present, recognizable, and significant harm to public health, safety, or financial welfare, and would require the office to document specific findings—such as whether harm exists and, if so, its severity, probability, and permanence—each time it reviews an occupational regulation. The office would also be required to review and respond to inquiries from members of the public about occupational regulations, though this duty would be limited by the office's available capacity and resources, and the office would have to identify and notify the state legislators who represent anyone who submits such an inquiry. Finally, the bill would require the office's annual report to the Legislature to summarize responses to inquiries from both legislators and members of the public, rather than just legislators as under current law.
Current version: HB0433S01 (Substitute)
Introduction
Jan 30
House Rules
House Committee
Feb 20
House Floor Vote
Feb 26
Senate Rules
Mar 4
Senate Committee
Mar 3
Senate 2nd Reading
Mar 4
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
IntroductionJan 30
House Rules
House CommitteeFeb 20
House Floor VoteFeb 26
Senate RulesMar 4
Senate CommitteeMar 3
Senate 2nd ReadingMar 4
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
This bill modifies the oversight of the Office of Professional Licensure Review.
This bill:
AI-generated summary, not yet reviewed by Better Utah staff. Please consult the bill text.
The Office of Professional Licensure Review, the state body that examines whether occupational licensing rules are necessary and appropriate, would see updates to how it conducts and documents its work under this bill. It would formally define "harm" as a present, recognizable, and significant harm to public health, safety, or financial welfare, and would require the office to document specific findings—such as whether harm exists and, if so, its severity, probability, and permanence—each time it reviews an occupational regulation. The office would also be required to review and respond to inquiries from members of the public about occupational regulations, though this duty would be limited by the office's available capacity and resources, and the office would have to identify and notify the state legislators who represent anyone who submits such an inquiry. Finally, the bill would require the office's annual report to the Legislature to summarize responses to inquiries from both legislators and members of the public, rather than just legislators as under current law.
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
Motion: Favorable Recommendation
House/ filed
House file for bills not passed
House/ received from Senate
Clerk of the House
Senate/ to House
Clerk of the House
Senate/ strike enacting clause
Senate Secretary
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules
Senate Rules Committee
Last updated Aug 29, 2026, 5:26 PM