Local Planning and Regulation Impacts on Wildlife Amendments
Introduction
Jan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
This bill modifies provisions relating to local government land use plans and regulations.
This bill:
AI-generated summary. We recommend consulting the bill text for important decisions.
Utah cities and counties are already required by state law to adopt long-range general plans and land use regulations that guide how land is developed. This bill expands those requirements by directing every municipality and county to address wildlife habitat connectivity and migration corridors — the routes animals use to move between habitats — as a required topic in their general plans, and to consider the impacts of development on wildlife movement and habitat when adopting land use regulations. The consideration is framed as advisory ("to the extent the legislative body determines advisable"), meaning local governments must engage with the question but retain discretion over how to respond to it. The bill also requires the Department of Natural Resources to provide relevant wildlife information to any city or county that requests it.
Introduction
Jan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
IntroductionJan 20
House Rules
House Committee
House Floor Vote
Senate Rules
Senate Committee
Senate 2nd Reading
Senate 3rd Reading
Governor
This bill modifies provisions relating to local government land use plans and regulations.
This bill:
AI-generated summary. We recommend consulting the bill text for important decisions.
Utah cities and counties are already required by state law to adopt long-range general plans and land use regulations that guide how land is developed. This bill expands those requirements by directing every municipality and county to address wildlife habitat connectivity and migration corridors — the routes animals use to move between habitats — as a required topic in their general plans, and to consider the impacts of development on wildlife movement and habitat when adopting land use regulations. The consideration is framed as advisory ("to the extent the legislative body determines advisable"), meaning local governments must engage with the question but retain discretion over how to respond to it. The bill also requires the Department of Natural Resources to provide relevant wildlife information to any city or county that requests it.
House/ filed
House file for bills not passed
House/ strike enacting clause
Clerk of the House
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
House Rules Committee
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0285
Released
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0285
Version Sponsor
Last updated Mar 26, 2026, 9:40 PM